QUICK Update
JULY 2005 ISSUE

"Making R&D Lean"

Donald Reinertsen and Leland Schaeffer

Research-Technology Management

July/August 2005, pp. 51-56

While there are some similarities between manufacturing and R&D, the authors note four main differences to be taken into account when creating lean R&D:

  • All variability is bad in manufacturing, and reducing variability improves the process. R&D cannot eliminate all variability in its function without reducing all value-added.
  • Manufacturing adds value to physical objects, that can only be in one place at a time. R&D adds value to information, which can be in multiple places at the same time.
  • R&D must constantly adapt to emerging information, while manufacturing has more fixed requirements.
  • Taking risks is crucial in R&D, so mistakes are more easily tolerated.

Given these differences, the authors consider ten lean principles and propose adaptations for R&D:

  • Reduce batch sizes—In R&D, smaller batch size means that information is released more frequently;
  • Make the process tolerate all necessary variability—R&D tries to capture the value of "good" variability, while minimizing the cost;
  • Focus on maintaining flow instead of perfect planning—R&D must respond flexibly to emerging information.
  • Pull, don't push—"Daily assignments of goals and resources are made in response to the current status of work."
  • Create fast, powerful, feedback loops—"Researchers feel more in control, are more willing to take risks, and are more inclined to use initiative when unproductive paths can be quickly truncated."
  • Requirements are seldom required—"In R&D we must be willing and able to modify our goals in the presence of compelling new information."
  • Invest in flexibility—"Preparation involves broadening skill sets before they are needed."
  • Achieve adequate failure rates—"Lean R&D manages risk by accepting higher 'efficient' failure rates and limiting the downside consequences of these failures."
  • Understand the economics of waste—"...the relative economic importance of wasted cycle time, compared to wasted expenses, can be over 200 times greater in R&D than manufacturing."
  • Control the right parameter—Understand the critical path and control the parameters that may interfere with the path.

Back to top of page

Wayland Secrest, Ph.D.
Editor
2800 Livernois, Suite 130
Troy, Michigan 48083
Phone 800.346.9533
Fax 248.457.0648

QUICK Update is published monthly by GP Deltapoint. GP Deltapoint, a division of General Physics Corporation, is a management consulting firm that assists clients in their pursuit of operational excellence and rapid improvement. For a complimentary electronic subscription, contact quick@gpworldwide.com.

For any further research or information assistance, contact the editor at the above address and phone number, or at quick@gpworldwide.com. You can visit Deltapoint online at: www.gpworldwide.com/deltapoint/.

To obtain copies of any articles listed, please contact your corporate library. Most articles also are available from IngentaConnect (formerly UnCover): www.ingentaconnect.com. Books may be obtained through your corporate library, your local bookstore, or the book's publisher.

© 2005 by General Physics Corporation
All rights reserved
Questions? E-mail the webmaster
© 2005 by General Physics Corporation
All rights reserved